This blog is about the relationship between organizations and the people who work for them. And, it’s dedicated to the millions of people around the world who go to work every day wanting to do a great job.

External communication

Connecting for big business benefits

This morning I came across three articles. Three different perspectives. Same conclusion. The more connected we are as leaders and as organizations the better.

Perspective 1 - CEOs. A study of 65 chief executives from around the world discovered that CEOs spend an average of 6 hours out of their 55-hour work week alone. The remainder of the time is spent in business meetings [virtual and face-to-face] and lunches and on the phone. CEOs may not like it, but it is how their work gets done and confirms Henry Mintzberg‘s seminal study “The nature of managerial work”  [1973].

Perspective 2: Leadership teams. In their new book Strategy & Business, Rob Cross and Jon Katzenbach describe how: “In most companies, the phrase top team is a misnomer…” Instead, they go on to say:  [P]ower comes from … members’ informal and social networks, their determination to make the most of those connections, and their ability to work well in subgroups formed to address specific issues… [A]s much as 90 per cent of the information that most senior executives receive and take action on comes throughout their informal networks – not formal reports or databases.” The conclusion: Enriching networks enriches organizations.

Perspective 3: Organizations. ”Web 2.0 … promote[s] significantly more flexible processes at internally networked organizations: respondents say that information is shared more readily and less hierarchically, collaboration across organizational silos is more common, and tasks are more often tackled in a project-based fashion.” This study goes on to demonstrate that the more networked an organization the more business benefits. If you, or your leadership team, ever had any doubts it’s worth taking a look.

Connecting is what we as human beings do. We’re social creatures. Our organizational work gets done with, and through, other people.

Helping your employees connect. A little idea with huge potential business benefits.

It’s a potentially beautiful thing.

YouTube Preview Image

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why communication fails

The other day I ran across a question on an on-line discussion group for people in Organizational Design and Training: “Why do you think communication fails in organizations?” If you’re tempted to say “good question” think again. It is, I think, a bad question.  Bad because there is no such thing as “communication” in organizations, only particular people trying to make themselves understood in particular ways for particular purposes in particular circumstances. The question “why do you think communication fails in organizations” invites mistaken one-size-fits-all answers: sales never listens, people are too sensitive, too little too late.  It would be nice if there was a simple answer. Unfortunately, there isn’t, which means the next time you want to “communicate” you’re going to have to do the inescapable hard work of figuring out precisely what you want to say to whom for what purpose. If this is a formula, it certainly isn’t a simple one, which is perhaps why “communication fails in organizations.”

And now you know what you have to do if you want success. 

YouTube Preview Image

When form becomes formula

I know many of you are fans, as I am, of design and Design Thinking.  The field has much to offer. Understanding the ‘customer’ experience from the ‘customer’s point of view is how I’ve spent much of my career. It’s the basis of what I do when I help clients design and implement successful internal and external communications strategies.

Last month, there was a Design Thinking unConference held in Vancouver. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to make it, so today I’ve been trying to pick up some of the threads of the conversation and I tripped across this talk by Harold Nelson, author of The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World and Nierenberg Distinguished Professor of Design in the School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University.

It’s a bit of a ramble but quite thoughtful. For those of you who don’t have 8 minutes: He cautions us on the “commoditization of design thinking”. And suggests that “Design Thinking can effect human evolution”… “it’s “a big deal and it’s not 4 steps you can sell to commercial clients to guarantee product success.”

Once form becomes formula we become mindless. Once we are mindlessly implementing steps the power of the form is lost. Something to think about.  And not just as it applies to Design Thinking.

Tags: , ,

What’s the value of a good relationship?

Being open. Being collaborative. Being innovative. We all say this is a good thing. But how does being open, collaborative, innovative add value to your organization?

The focus on social media – the tools and tactics – is taking us away from this more important question.

What’s the value of a good relationship to your organization? Here’s a conversation between Charlene Li and Gary Hamel.

What’s a good relationship look like? with your employees? your customers? your supply chain? your board? And what’s the value of that relationship to the business. Is anyone in your organization is really thinking about that? 

 

Tags: , ,

Do we know what we’re doing?

I’m just back after an “official” training run.  Those of you who know me, know I am passionate about chiwalking and running.  Though a “late in life” runner I came to believe what my trainer told me, that running is “perfect freedom”.  It took three years to find any level of enjoyment, but I did and was getting quite confident and competent.

Last June due to unrelated injuries Michael and I stopped running.  It started as a short break.  We continued to chiwalk regularly and at a pretty fast pace – racking in many kilometres up, over and around Mont Royal during the fall, winter and spring.  In fact our winter chiwalks made the winter quite wonderful no matter what the conditions – rain, snow, sleet, sunny, cloudy, -10C, -30C.  They are all about focus and alignment two of my favourite things.

Now, almost a year later we realize that even though our chiwalks have no doubt kept us relatively fit, they aren’t giving us the same results as chirunning.  Over the spring we’ve integrated a few short 20 minute runs, but without any real discipline [and to be honest mostly downhill – small cheat].  This morning was different.  We followed lesson 1 of Danny Dreyer’s training guide for beginners, a 12-week program to prepare for a 10K. We went for a relatively flat [not my favourite, since I like the variation of trail running] 5 minutes on and 1 minute off chirun repeated 6 times.

Big lesson:  If you want to build and maintain capacity then there’s only one way to do it and that’s with discipline and practice.

You’ll not be surprised to hear that this experience has made me think about whether and how we can achieve an adequate level of communication mastery in our organizations?

Relationships are fundamental to organizations.  Organizations exist based on the assumption that working together we can do something we can’t do alone.  Given that human relationships without communication are impossible to imagine then communication mastery, must be a critical factor for success of any organization. But do we think about communication in that way?

I don’t think we do.  We may make the odd nod to individual development, but  institutionally I think we make the assumption that since virtually all employees can speak, write and hear then as an institution you’re communicating.  This of course is simply not true.  Any more than making the assumption if you can walk, you can run is true. [Or if you can walk you’re walking in an aligned and efficient way that will protect your body [that’s another story].] It takes training, discipline and practice to build and maintain adequate levels of skill and capacity.

So, what would communication mastery look like?  Not just for your employees or managers but for your institution as a whole?  What are the institutional benefits of achieving that level of mastery?  Where are you today in relationship to that level of mastery?  What actions would you need to put in place to get there?  And, how do you create the right conditions for achieving it?

I think these are fundamental institutional questions.  Shouldn’t we be thinking about getting this conversation going?  Are you ready?

 

Tags: , , , , ,

The black hole & the employer brand

Human resource departments talk a lot about the employer brand; the ultimate reflection of the employee experience of the brand.  And given the growing challenge of getting the best people, it’s something that all business leaders are beginning to worry about.

So, imagine my surprise to read that “nearly 30 percent of executives surveyed by search firm Korn/Ferry International said job applicants aren’t being treated respectfully by potential employers”!  These executives report the following experiences:

  • No confirmation that their application arrived
  • Interviews that turn out to have been set up for other candidates
  • Interviews that have been set up for the wrong job
  • Interviewers who are under prepared
  • No follow-up after interviews
  • No answers to e-mails or phone messages
  • A big black hole.

This isn’t any old recruitment.  This is executive recruitment.  Presumably people who have more money and influence than most.  Makes you pretty sure that it’s a lot worse for your average job seeker.

We know bad news travels faster than good news.  We know the value of the brand experience as an employee or as a customer.  It’s pure gold.  And the erosion of the brand experience a business killer.  So, how could we be going so wrong in what seems like such a simple matter – basic courtesy?

Could it be because of overworked employees?  Sucky values?  Bad training?  Too many files?  Too few hours?  Not the right tools to do the job?  Or all of the above?

I don’t know, but as communicators we’re all about helping our organizations [and their employees] build strong positive relationships with all our stakeholders, so I think it’s something worth looking into and taking action on.  The employer brand starts here.

Tags: , , , ,

Humanizing cold hard facts

Yesterday, my cousin’s wife [thanks Star], sent me a link to Lightening in a Jar.

It’s a slide show. It has no special effects.  The photography is mediocre.  The graphics bland.  It’s got the sappiest music ever. There’s no action.  No voiceover.  It’s just a series of  pretty dry facts.

I’ve seen it before.  It struck me then as it did now.  It’s so cheesy and still so very compelling.  Why?

The genius  is that it brings the humanity back to something that is otherwise just conceptual – the population of the world [can anyone picture billions], the number of people who wake up hungry [can anyone picture a %?].  They take what is otherwise incomprehensible and sometimes overwhelming data and translate it into something very human; something we can all picture – a small village of 100 people.  It’s a simple idea, not all that well implemented, and the result is brilliant.

There’s something for every manager and communicator to learn here.  Conceptual cold hard facts can tell stories that are relevant, meaningful and emotionally powerful!  Now for that simple idea.

Tags: , , ,

Deborah Hinton Wednesday, February 9th, 2011
Permalink Communication, External communication, Internal communication No Comments

It’s about the system. It’s about balance.

Today’s inspiration comes from C-Notes.  The question posed was [and I’m paraphrasing]:  As you design the customer experience do you think about it from a system point of view?  Do you think about the balance?

I don’t think we do.  And, we do even less of this kind of thinking when we start talking about the employee experience.  We don’t seem to have/or take the time to really understand these relationships, the kind of experience we want them to have and the implications  that would have on what and how we do things.

It’s the kind of process that takes up front thinking.  It takes time.  And it can challenge all kinds of preconceived notions and assumptions.  This kind of thoughtful and intentional orientation to organizational change is much more like walking a labyrinth – all be it one on steroids – than any linear change model would ever suggest.

And in my experience, very few organizations have the will to really think it through; to back up and understand what they are trying to do and the implications that has on their organization and the communities around them.  But when they do what happens next is amazing.  Teams gain deeper understanding. Decisions that were written in stone are reversed or adjusted.  Opportunities open up that had never existed or been explored.  Barriers disappear.  Things change for the better; for employees, for customers and for investors.

Has your organization got what it takes for this kind of conversation?

Tags: , ,

Getting believable

The Edelman Trust Barometer for 2011 is sobering reading as it has been for the past couple of years.  Trust is down virtually everywhere.  Again!

Buried near the end of the 2011 report is a slide that reads:  “Repetition enhances believability”.

Now, the barometer is all about organizations and trust [external], but it reminded me how often I’ve ended up in conversations where the theme has been something like:  “Well I told them last quarter…”  “We published it in the employee newsletter last spring…”  “We had a town hall …”  “The e-mail went last week…”  “Why don’t they get it?”

Are there any lessons here?

It’s easy inside organizations to assume that because we’ve said it once everybody not only gets it they believe it.  I’m guessing that the same rules that apply outside apply in – the more we repeat, the more channels we use, the more different ways we find to say it the higher the likelihood that employees will not only hear it but will believe it.

And it’s easy inside organizations to assume that because we’ve done one employee survey we really get it.  What’s interesting is that if being believable when you’re sending means you need to repeat it then maybe we need to be more aware when we’re on receive too!

Are we dismissing things we’ve only seen or heard once or twice from employees in formal surveys?  How much opportunity are we giving to employees to express themselves repeatedly and through multiple channels?  And if we are, how often are we pulling their feedback together in a meaningful way?

Tags: , , , , ,

Great idea # 3: Building pride – The Hudson Bay Company story

An occasional post on a really great idea for employee communications

– simple and high impact.

For those of you who don’t know, The Bay was incorporated “…by British royal charter in 1670 as The Governor and Company of Adventurers of England trading into Hudson’s Bay” making it “… the oldest commercial corporation in North America and one of the oldest in the world.” [source]  I grew up knowing it as The Hudson Bay Company.  Somewhere along the line it became HBC and The Bay.

And somewhere along the line the adventure was over.  The Bay had become a tired and dowdy department store owned by venture capitalists.  You couldn’t even find a Hudson Bay Company Point Blanket anywhere in the store.

And somewhere along the line over 70,000 employees and millions of customers had lost the spirit. Products were uninteresting.  And the service was nonexistent or surly.

Enter Bonnie Brooks, Chief Adventurer (aka President and CEO), The Bay, Hudson’s Bay Company. The store, here in Montreal, looks the same from the outside.  But inside there’s a lot going on and it’s all good.

In the two years since she was named, Bonnie Brooks has managed to transform this dying department store. And she’s done it by going back to basics:  Building pride in the founding spirit of adventure and discovery.  The things that connect the business to this incredible 400 year history that had been lost.  And, she’s managed to take mostly hourly minimum-wage employees with her by building their pride – in the institution, in leadership and in the work they do for customers every day.  Genius.

She’s “invited employees on a mission”.  A mission to engage with the business and their customers.  And they are.  Their pride in the company and what they are doing is palpable.

She’s managed in a very short time to reignite pride in the institution and the heritage and tradition of the past.  She’s changed the employee experience.  And in doing so she’s changed the customer experience.

A simple idea.  Incredibly well executed.  Good for employees.  Good for customers.  And good for The Bay.

Congratulations Bonnie!

YouTube Preview Image

PS:  The iconic blanket stripes are now trademark protected and you can now find the Hudson Bay Company Point blankets, pillows and other gift items that reflect the traditional bay colours and spirit in their in-store boutiques.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,